"But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. subscription yet. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle argues that its impossible to track the momentum and position of a subatomic particle. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest There were many more, but I will leave them for others. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. subscription. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). John Haglin "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. Do We Know!? is god-awful. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. Do We Know!?) . Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. Your subscription to Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. The observer can't be ignored." : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. 34 talking about this. Consciousness must be involved. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. By continuing to browse the site In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. Amit Gotswami We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. Quotes From the Movies Science Of The Mind Fifth Dimension Joe Dispenza Get What You Want Neurons Brain Spirituality The infinite info that the brain is processing every single second tells us there is more to the world then we're perceiving it. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. They want suggestions, not formulas. Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. It is just a movie. Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. He claims the drop was achieved. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . 7. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? 8. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. It was really hard to sit through. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. log out. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. What the bleep do we know debunked Isn't life great? You dont have a Christian Science Monitor Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." " " " !". (stylized as What t #$*! Check out this great listen on Audible.com. If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. Wow, indeed! As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". 1. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? The brain wasn't born yesterday. Presentations ranging from "The Secret" to "What the Bleep Do We Know?" The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. A movie and a book said that water molecules are. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! It was one of the most important moments in history. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. We'll never know. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. 3. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects.
